Skip to content
/
Try

Skink vs Helix

Ctrl+D for the next match, Alt+Shift+↓ for the line below.

Helix and Skink share a goal: a terminal editor where language servers and tree-sitter work on first start, with no plugin setup. The difference is the editing model. Helix is modal and selection-first; Skink is modeless with Micro / VS Code style keys.

Helix is the more mature project. Skink adds a terminal tab, git tooling and an AI agent client.

  • You want modal editing. Helix’s “select first, then act” model (the Kakoune tradition) makes more sense to you than Vim’s.
  • You want maturity. Helix has a large user base and broad language configuration. Skink is alpha.
  • You need a language Skink does not cover. Helix supports many more languages out of the box. Skink has tree-sitter for 19 by default and starts servers for six.
  • No modes. You want IDE features in the terminal without learning a modal model.
  • A real terminal inside the editor. Helix has no built-in terminal. Skink has terminal tabs, a bottom dock, history search and clickable file:line links.
  • Git in the editor. Hunks you can stage or revert, inline blame, a git panel, side-by-side diff and conflict resolution.
  • AI agents. You run Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex or others and want a prompt box with inline diff review and an agent panel.
Skink Helix
Editing model Modeless Modal, selection-first
Mouse On On by default (mouse = true)
Multiple cursors Yes (Ctrl+D, Alt+click) Yes, central to the model
LSP Built in Built in
tree-sitter Built in Built in, many languages
Built-in terminal Yes No
Git Gutter, hunks, blame, panel, diff Gutter diff markers
AI agents ACP client No built-in agent client
Plugins None yet Not in mainline yet (a Scheme-based system is in development)
Debugger Yes (DAP) Experimental
Clipboard over SSH OSC 52 by default clipboard-provider = "termcode"
Works over plain SSH Yes Yes
Footprint Small Small (runtime folder with grammars and queries)
Maturity Alpha Mature

Neither has a plugin system you can use today. What ships is what you get, so the built-in feature list is the real comparison.

What Helix does with a selection plus a verb, Skink does with familiar shortcuts:

Helix Skink
w, b to select words Ctrl+Shift+→ / ←
x select line Home, then Shift+↓
Alt-o / Alt-i expand / shrink to syntax node Alt+O / Alt+I (:expand / :contract)
C copy selection to next line Alt+Shift+↓ (:cursorbelow)
* then n for next match Ctrl+D repeatedly
d / y / p Ctrl+X / Ctrl+C / Ctrl+V
Space f file picker Alt+P (or :recent)
Space / global search Alt+S
Space r rename Alt+Shift+R
Space a code action Alt+Enter (:fix)
gd Alt+G (:def)
:w, :q Ctrl+S, Ctrl+Q (or :w, :q)

Commands like :w are typed after Ctrl+E, which opens the command line with the colon already shown. Every key also has a typed command (like :expand, :cursorbelow and :fix above), which helps when a terminal swallows an Alt chord. See typed commands.

Rename, code actions, project replace and structural replace (:srep) open a refactor preview in Skink. It lists files and hunks with checkboxes and a side-by-side diff, so you can uncheck the parts you do not want.

Skink’s authors read Helix’s design, but no Helix code is used. Helix is MPL-2.0; Skink is MIT OR Apache-2.0 and only takes code from permissively licensed projects.

Both are written in Rust and use tree-sitter.

Terminal window
curl -fsSL https://skink.cc/install.sh | sh
skink .

Helix and Skink install side by side, and both use the language servers you already have on PATH.

Next: quick start, or compare with Neovim.